As
with most developments in human activity, ESP was not a planned and coherent
movement, but rather a phenomenon that grew out of a number of converging
trends. There are three main reasons common to the emergence of all ESP:
1.
The demands of a Brave New World
The
general effect of all this development was to exert pressure on the language
teaching profession to deliver the required goods. Whereas English had
previously decided its own destiny, it now become
subject to the wishes, needs and demands of people other than language teacher.
subject to the wishes, needs and demands of people other than language teacher.
English
had become accountable to the scrutiny of the wider world and the traditional
leisurely and purposes free stroll through the landscape of the English
language seemed no longer appropriate in the harsher realities of the market
place.
2.
A Revolution in Linguistics
Traditionally
the aims of linguistics had been to describe the rules of English usage, that
is the grammar. In English language teaching this gave rise to the view that
there are important differences between, say, the English of commerce and that
of engineer.
Most
of the work at this time was in the area of English for Science and technology
(EST) and for time ESP and EST were regarded as almost synonymous. The gained
ground that English needed by a particular group of learners could be
identified by analyzing the linguistic characteristics of their specialist area
of work or study.
3.
Focus of the Learner
New
developments in educational psychology also contributed to the rise of ESP, by
emphasizing the central importance of the learners and their attitude to
learning (e.g. Rodgers, 1969).
Learners
were seen to have different needs and interest, which would have an important
influence or their motivation to learn and therefore on the activeness of their
learning. This lent support to the development of courses in the which
relevance to the learners need and interests was paramount.

0 comments:
Post a Comment